7 is so high to achive

Hyunbok

We are over the world.
It is very difficult to gather 7.
3 is good to enjoy.

hasmith

Yes I agree I'm in a certain time some and play late at night

liltexhon

Not all of our player will play .it really hard to get 7 wish they would lower

Nick37

It is impossible to get 7 guild members signed up at the same time when we are in so many time zones, it definitely needs reducing to 5 or even 4.

I_Am_Psycho

I suggested slightly bigger guilds but everyone laughed at me based on recruitment trends BEFORE GW.

I meant only to 25 or 30. Just enough to tilt the balance for getting minimum required entries, without causing too much risk of too many from one guild trying at the same time (in which case they'd have a luxury problem solvable with mutual time coordination).

I still stand by that suggestion. It lessens the risk of guilds osing due to being massively outnumbered as well.

Aalana757

Need to lower the amount of players to complete. Guilds have players in different time zones and even countries. Hard to get the whole guild on line at the same time. Also lower level guild members not allowed to complete and help make the numbers. Very frustrating.

I_Am_Psycho

Oh ... OK then.

I didn't suggest slightly larger guilds and everyone laughed.

AND

7 is not too much for a significant proportion of guilds that want to play GW.

Stalker20

You could also say 7 is too many for a significant proportion of guilds. Apples and oranges.

I_Am_Psycho

Nah ... I think it's someone's marmite. Hahaha

ZombieHunter

You have to get a minimum number of your team from all over the world in different time zones at the same time, you basically have to buy gas then if you meet all of those requirements - you only get 3 keys so you have to figure out the trifecta of playing then only do it 3 times max while the Distance and Challenge are running simultaneously. Very well thought out NG.

I_Am_Psycho

Danski_46 said:

You could also say 7 is too many for a significant proportion of guilds. Apples and oranges.

I basically did say exactly that. You'll easily see the logic behind that post if you look at which posts had negative reaction, just above it.

Meatleg

Perhaps GW could have different group settings.
Bastketball is five on five right? But people also play three on three.

Make it so that if you have three players ready to go, you get paired up against another guild that also has three ready to go. And 4v4, 5v5 etc.

I sure would love to play, but 7 is way too high.

LoneWanderer360

I don't know why there has to be any specific number of players at all. Can't you just match teams based on how many sign up?

Herberge

I'm for 3 players on GW, No more No less to avoid outnumbering by other guild and the looooong waiting (I fell asleep twice waiting). to complete 7 players. This suggestion came from a fact based on the normal occurrence of numbers of players on-line at the same time.

Currently, the only solution we are doing is to have other players join in GW even though they will not be able to play, just to complete the 7 player-requirement, that's why we sometimes lost due to outnumber.

SCBMA

If they limited it to a maximum of three members per battle we could never reach the Sanctuary maps. It would be impossible, and those maps are the most fun for me to play.

Meatleg

Why require seven when only two are awake to play anyway? We won even when five of our guys were AFK.

piRat

Honestly I get why you choose 7 on paper looks like a good amount in case 1 or 2 people sign up for the battle but don’t play but we just can’t! The time zones make it far too hard and when we somehow do manage to get 7 we don’t get UPDATED! we got 7 ONE time and after checking back in for half an hour I had given up like most of my guild so when we got that 7th member only 3 of the players knew and only 3 people participate.

piRat

Okay again it happened again! We cannot spend all day with the damn app open! Send a fucking notification when all seven slots are filled!! If you’re not gonna lower the number at least fix that !!

Stalker20

> @piRat said:
> Okay again it happened again! We cannot spend all day with the damn app open! Send a fucking notification when all seven slots are filled!! If you’re not gonna lower the number at least fix that !!

https://www.priorygroup.com/mental-health/anger-management

Captainslayer

We are a fully international guild with about 6 or 7 different time zones we manage to get between 8-10 ppl and use all our keys, outside chats apps help alot

Flood1980

Game needs to have a live chat so guilds can recruit nomad players... nomad players should be allowed to leave guild long enough to battle with active guild then go back to their own guild once battle is over

slasher1962

Yes 7 is to high we have 15 active players but not more then 3 or 4 on at the same time lower the number please

xbamfx

If you can’t get 7 people to play GW then stick to challenge. Problem solved

Steeboon

> @SCBMA said:
> If they limited it to a maximum of three members per battle we could never reach the Sanctuary maps. It would be impossible, and those maps are the most fun for me to play.

Very soon the call to reduce the grind will arrive once again 😝

I do like playing against the AI humans, not the normal missions. #endthegrind😂

Ronin_Dave

Organizing seven players from different countries and time zones is tough, especially since the game doesn’t really offer an effective guild chat to facilitate detailed coordination. This necessitates a need to convince members to d/l and use a third party forum to try to organize. I’m in favor of smaller teams in order to actually be able to play more often.
Over the last two wars, my guild (I’m the leader and chief organizer) has spent hours watching and waiting the sign up screen in hopes of getting a sixth or seventh player. Very discouraging to see someone in one time zone give up only to have the sixth or seventh player sign in a few minutes later...