How Many Leg., Epic & Rare Badges Do Players Have?

these are my modest badges...im working on better ones

9 legendary, 99 epic too many to count rare

why use damage bagdes on bruisers...it would be perfect if you replace those 2 damage badges with damage reduction badges

I'm to lazy to swap them out. I redo them every free badge swap.

> @Movado said:
> I was able to fine-tune this guy a little bit. Still a work in progress. But I kept hearing that Jackie Brown movie quote in my head: "When you absolutely positively got to kill every mother*cker in the room, accept no substitutes."
>
> Thanks Samuel L. Jackson!

if he has ruthless trait his critical attack must be at least 50k i think...just immagine the shooter weeks...he must kill everything in his way with one shot

No legendary here

Total badges: 186 (dump most all common badges)

Assigned;
Legendary: 4
Epic: 14
Rare: 46
Uncommon: 44

Unassigned;
Legendary: 0
Epic: 1
Rare: 4
Uncommon: 44

Legendary - 4
epic - 19

Too many.

@aquila - I was recently informed that the formula for badge capacity is 6*number of survivor SLOTS +100

As for me, I'm up to:
19 LEG (3 are crit chance, and 10 came from this event)
113 Epic (every type other than crit chance, ~60 from this event)
168 Rare (no crit chance or crit damage flat)
100 Uncommon (only Damage%/Health%/Damage Resistance)

not too shabby for earning them only from the distance and post mission crates...no component crates for gold here...but i also benefitted from hating to equip badges (didn't even bother unequipping them last free removal event), thus not creating any the last few months, outside of the two events...so i probably won't be equipping any of the badges from the last two events for a while)

Leg: 18
Epic: 104
Rare: Too fucking many

Here is my favorite badged survivor from each class. I either go for pure damage, pure tankiness, or a combination of both. 80% damage reduction is AMAZING

[ ASSAULT ]




[ HUNTER ]




[ SHOOTER ]




[ BRUISER ]




[ WARRIOR ]




[ SCOUT ]

Thanks @OneLessTitan , you're very informative once more, the calculation fits exactly.