Discussion: Update Notes 3.2

> @RealClareB said:
> The dev-team is either desperate for ideas or persistent in killing the not-as-profitable-as-before game.
>
> Let’s be honest, when the first heroes were introduced to the game, many of them had plain stupid perks. I think it started to change ever since Governor, Merle, Aaron, with him being almost what every players needs from a shooter. Then, together with a start of GW, the new Daryl & Rick were introduced. What first seemed like a prank, has turned out to be a perfect couple of heroes. As if they were intended to be a team just like in TV-series. The duo with perfectly matching leader-traits has sparked interest among my alliance mates to play a different set of survivors, rather than Sasha/Abra/shooter. Within months players realized the duo’s power and I’m sure has spent more time turning up the notch in Challenges and burning radios. Now, with the introduction of the new Maggie there might be another switch in a game paradigm, or rather another tactic to succeed in Challenges.
>
> All of that looked like a perfect future for a game.
>
> N#GGERS (people who annoy you, remember that?)said “wy so? I didna tot of dis. DaRyck look like game-bug. I wus stoopid. Nauh I suk at di gaim.”
>
> “GEAH!” the dev-team said. “Screw you, bug users!”
>
> “Screw you!” I say. What seemed like a supa-dupa feature in the game, now is fixed.
>
> The New Maggie? Seriously? A tower-shooter? Is you dumb or you stoopid?
>
> You introduced a new inferior hero (on the real, she looks good) and fixed DaRick. I’m not even reminding about The Infinite Guild Wars Bugs.
>
>
>
> You are either not very smart know what to do, or you smart enough to kill it on purpose.
>
>
>
> Yeah, I AM toxic.
>
> I have no idea what you're wittering about.

You probably have that mosaic thinking, on the real. Sorry for you loss.

#keepingnonheroesrelevant

Hmmm, for new Maggie to be universally useful then I agree - defensive stance is a very poor trait.

What I think NG have tried to do is create her to be used for taking out defenders in GW (and outpost). Defensive stance makes her less vulnerable when left in overwatch vs. onrushing human defenders while the extra action points are perfect when counterattacking defenders. On that basis, I can kinda see what they might have been aiming for.

Keeping the peace - double taps against defenders OR taking out very high level enemies in Distance
Revenge - best defensive trait against onrushing human enemies
Sure shot - arguably works well with the over-watch based traits like DS
Defensive stance - good for that first turn as you set up overwatched defenders, esp against hunters/shooters
Ruthless - weirdly I think this one sits least well with the other traits above as it's hard/time wasting to charge up in GW

Vigilant would have made sense IMO. Marksman or Lucky to make her a better all rounder.

Hell, even bullet dodge might have rounded off the other 4 skills better (don't shoot me). The only reason I can see Ruthless is for using that hero skill for taking out lv41/42 special walkers in the Distance.

WellyLuga said:

@DrUnpleasant Sure shot only works on your turn and so doesn't work whilst in overwatch. Having those two traits is a waste as you can only use one or the other.

Good points about GW, I suppose you could attack using sure shot and then if her trait triggers you could put her in overwatch after that. Very situational though.

Aye, and I was thinking about situations where you could arm with an interrupt weapon in overwatch, then when the enemy runs into your field you stop them - then use sure shot + keeping the peace to kill them off at the start of the next round.

Any Info on Version 3.2.1 which did hit iOS store 15 hours ago?

And still no upgrade to tomato storage or production...

yaniska said:

Not very happy for the duplication of Maggie who left the series although temporarily .. New characters is not really possible to have them?

For you: Hilltop Maggie is Lydia.